Showing posts with label Beef. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Beef. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Winter Manure Application: Best Practices and Rules


by Ted Funk, consulting engineer with the 
Illinois Beef Association and a retired agricultural engineer at the University of Illinois

It seems that every year around this time, full manure storages and Old Man Winter team up to force a difficult choice for some livestock farmers. Where, when, and how can we apply manure safely?

The risks of nitrogen loss and phosphorus runoff are related to the amount of time between nutrient application and the crops taking up those nutrients. But the major risk in winter is gross movement of manure to surface water causing offensive conditions. “Risk” is the key word here, and we must wisely balance three risks:
  • water quality impacts from field runoff, due to uncontrollable weather event(s) after manure application
  • manure storages having sufficient capacity vs. overflowing from normal and/or abnormal inputs
  • getting crops planted late vs. under the right conditions in springtime
Full manure storages, with no place to go, clearly put your farm in jeopardy. Even more important, earthen-embankment storages (lagoons or holding ponds) that overtop may experience catastrophic berm erosion failure, releasing large amounts of waste as a point source discharge. 

As of August 2014, there are some modifications to the Illinois EPA rules governing winter application of manure. Those rules affect classes of facilities in different ways, so let’s make sure you know in which class your facility falls. First, answer these questions that affect how you can approach winter spreading of liquid manure:

1. Are you operating under an NPDES permit or considering applying for coverage?

2. Are you working with Illinois NRCS under an EQIP contract that includes the 590 Nutrient Management standard?

3. Is your single facility considered “large” under the LMFA (based on more than 1,000 animal units capacity) or are you required under the LMFA, due to owning multiple facilities in Illinois that add up to more than 1,000 animal units capacity, to have the LMFA-style waste management plan?

4. Is your facility considered a “large CAFO” under the new IEPA CAFO regulation and you want the protection of the Ag Stormwater Exemption lined out in the new rule?


Answering these questions can be difficult for some facilities, but there are fine points about winter manure spreading regulations that may change your mind about where and when to spread.

Let’s be clear about timing. The really big and nasty manure runoff events occur in late winter, because that’s when the precipitation events are typically heavier. So, if you know you will be spreading in winter, get it over with early, and do not wait until late February or early March. 

If you answered “yes” to question (1), you have restrictions on winter spreading already spelled out in your permit. The new Illinois EPA rules affect new permits; existing NPDES permits operate under the older rules.

If you answered “yes” to question (2), my best advice is to confer with your local NRCS office about how to meet and maintain your obligations in the land treatment section of your Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan as it affects your EQIP contract.
A “yes” answer to question (3) puts your facility under the set of waste management plan rules in the LMFA (900.801 et seq). Consult the LMFA rule on facility size (900.802) to determine whether that set of rules applies to you.  Any size facility has to abide by the old Illinois EPA rule, Section 560 Design Criteria for Land Application of Livestock Waste, 560.206 Frozen or Snow-Covered Ground:  “Waste application on frozen or snow-covered land should be avoided. If wastes are spread on frozen or snow-covered land, such application should be limited to land areas on which:

a) Land slopes are 5 percent or less, or
b) Adequate erosion control practices exist.”

That’s it. Slope of the field, erosion control practices in place. 

However, if you are required by the LMFA by virtue of your facility size to have a waste management plan, the LMFA also requires that you keep records of the dates of application, the fields, and the amounts of manure applied to each field.

But here’s the caveat printed elsewhere in the regulation: even though the rules give vague restrictions about slope limits and “adequate erosion control practices,” you may still be subject to a complaint, investigation, and water quality violation notice if runoff to surface water occurs. Use common sense about where to apply, limit the rates and stay away from surface water. Prioritize fields for winter application, to reduce risk. Spread on the low-risk fields last in the season, if you need the room, and reserve some very low risk “bail-out” fields if possible.

Finally, if you answered question (4) with “yes” you now have a more extensive list of winter spreading restrictions than you did prior to the new set of rules. These restrictions don’t apply if soil conditions allow you to inject or incorporate the manure, but even then you are obliged to observe good practices according to your normal nutrient management plan. To claim the Ag Stormwater Exemption in the event of a discharge off your fields, you have to be able to show that you have taken appropriate and reasonable steps to get through the winter months without spreading manure—and that those steps just weren’t enough this year. Here are the winter restrictions (with my abbreviations) listed in Section 502.630 “Protocols to Land Apply Livestock Waste During Winter”:
  • No surface application is allowed on frozen, snow- or ice-covered land unless there is no practical alternative and your storage is going to overflow otherwise.
  • You must have a winter application plan in place; that plan includes your selection of available fields that meet the criteria in 502.630 c). Your list of available fields may change from year to year, depending on several factors including crop rotation.
  • You have notified IEPA in writing by Dec. 1 that your storages are insufficient to carry you through 120 days.
  • Surface spreading must be worked around the weather forecast. The rules are more stringent for snow or ice-covered fields than for just frozen ground. 
  • Setbacks are increased a lot for winter conditions. 
  • Monitoring fields for manure-laden discharges during melting and runoff is required, as is reporting such discharges to the Agency. See 502.630 for more details.
Calendar date 
Dec. 1 is the implied date, after which you need special dispensation to surface apply on frozen, ice or snow-covered fields, if you operate under an NPDES permit or want the Ag Stormwater Exemption for a Large CAFO.

Field characteristics
Anything that reduces soil erosion is usually a plus for selecting a manure application field. Extremes: surface-applied and unincorporated manure, normal rates, on a frozen HEL field that’s had corn silage removed—a formula for trouble. Injected liquid manure on a non-tile-drained, NHEL field that has lots of corn crop residue—you’re looking good. Which brings up all the discussion about vegetative buffers, vegetative fence rows, cover crops, pasture and hay field options, etc.—keep your options open when the spreading window starts to close. Tile drains could be trouble: monitor the outlets if you spread manure over tile drains. Some fields with shallow soils over bedrock, gravel, or sand should be avoided as well, and for operations with a permit, must be carefully selected.

Soil surface—snow or ice cover
If you surface apply on snow or ice, it’s reasonable to assume there won’t be any infiltration until the cover thaws—then snow or ice melt will take manure with it. The only protection you have is more distance to surface water, less slope, and more residue or crop cover. But if you can inject liquid manure into non-frozen soil beneath the surface, there is no specific prohibition against it—just the slope limit and vague erosion control guidelines. I’d suggest you carefully monitor runoff during a melt and do damage control if you find manure coming off the field.

Caveats
By the way, one of the more sure ways to force your operation into the NPDES permit program is to be slipshod about spreading manure in winter. No dumping! Manure should be applied at a maximum of the “agronomic” rate of nitrogen or phosphorus, depending on the specific situation. There is no provision in the rules for “emergency over-application” of manure! If you aren’t sure of the rate you should use, don’t guess; make a phone call. And there is no excuse for operating a spreader that has not been calibrated. 

Don’t spread close to, or onto, waterways. Observe common sense practices. Especially with drag hose applications doing surface application (since you don’t turn off the flow during turns), lay out the hose so that you stay well away from waterways or other conduits to surface water. Plan on leaving extra-wide setbacks if you are applying on frozen ground, especially if it is ice- or snow-covered. Be prepared to clean up releases caused during disconnecting and cleaning hoses.

Those facilities that are required by virtue of size (over 1,000 Animal Units) to have a manure management plan under the LMFA are already bound to respect the manure spreading setbacks from surface water and well heads. But those setbacks should be honored by smaller operations as well; fall and winter spreading are, if anything, more sensitive times for manure runoff, and setbacks help. Keep written records of manure storage levels as we head into winter. 


IBA has retained the services of Ted Funk, a licensed professional engineer and former University of Illinois agricultural engineering professor, to visit individual farms by request of producer members. IBA will share in the cost of this confidential professional service as a membership benefit. If you are interested in learning more about Dr. Funk’s services contact that IBA at 217-787-4280.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

American Heart Association® Certifies Extra Lean Ground Beef as Part of a Heart-Healthy Diet

The Beef Checkoff Program announced today that Extra Lean Ground Beef (Ground Beef that is at least 96% lean, 4% fat) is now certified by the American Heart Association® to display its recognized and respected Heart-Check mark. Retailers now have the opportunity to help identify eight different extra lean beef items as options for part of an overall healthy diet to their shoppers using one of the most trusted nutrition icons on food packaging today.
The extra lean beef cuts that meet the American Heart Association’s® requirements for heart-healthy foods as part of an overall healthy dietary pattern, and are certified to display the Heart-Check mark, include:

“Beef has many nutritional benefits and having the American Heart Association certify yet another beef cut empowers consumers to feel good about including beef in their diet, not only for its great taste but for its nutritional value,” said Jo Stanko, a cow-calf operator from Steamboat Springs, Colo., and vice chair of the Checkoff’s nutrition and health subcommittee. “Beef farmers and ranchers like myself share a common goal; to help consumers make shopping decisions to fit their needs and lifestyles by educating them about the health benefits of their food. To this end we will continue to support valid science to show consumers how extra lean beef is part of a healthy diet.”

Before putting its Heart-Check mark on any food, the American Heart Association® evaluates it against nutrition requirements based on sound science regarding healthy dietary recommendations, food categories, specific product ingredients and nutrient values.
Multiple retailers with hundreds of stores across the U.S. currently display the Heart-Check mark on certified beef items in the meat case. Retailers and processors can work with the Beef Checkoff Program to receive a discount on the certification fee for the American Heart Association® Food Certification Program.

Resources such as on-pack labels, posters and recipes are available for retailers to use in store and in shopper communications to promote the certified beef cuts.

To learn more about participating in the American Heart Association® Food Certification Program, please visit www.BeefRetail.org.

For more information about your beef checkoff investment, visit MyBeefCheckoff.com.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Illinois Beef Checkoff Referendum Scheduled


IBA encourages a "Yes" vote to keep dollars in the state for beef education and promotion.

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – Illinois beef producers will have the opportunity to approve a state beef checkoff program, controlled by Illinois cattlemen and women, that could generate additional funds to promote beef in Illinois.

Petitions signed by more than 700 producers were submitted to the Illinois Department of Agriculture requesting a referendum on the Illinois Beef Market Development Act. If approved, the 50-cent per-head that producers would pay into a state checkoff program would supplement the national checkoff program. The program will complement and extend current research, promotion of Illinois-raised beef, and efforts to educate the youth of our industry while strengthening beef demand in the marketplace. The Illinois Department of Agriculture will oversee the referendum process.

“Our current national checkoff started in 1986 and its buying power has been eroded by 56 percent due to inflation over the years,” said Reid Blossom, IBA executive vice president. “Just like input costs on the farm, the cost of promotion and education has risen. The industry must invest in order to reach Illinois consumers and ensure a viable beef business for years to come, and the proposed Illinois Beef Checkoff would help in a number of areas.”



The Illinois Beef Checkoff is a voluntary 50-cent assessment on all beef cattle in Illinois collected at the time of sale. The funds from this collection will be controlled by farmers serving on IBA’s Checkoff Division of the Board of Governors and any cattleman not wishing to participate can have their full assessment refunded.

Alan Adams, a beef producer from Sandwich, said for him, reinstating the Illinois Beef Checkoff makes sense.

“Our industry is up against tremendous adversity,” Adams said. “The national checkoff has been successful in combatting those challenges, but more resources are needed to more aggressively confront beef industry issues that are critical to our way of life. The fast completion of the petition process and early backing from the Vote Yes coalition shows that Illinois beef producers recognize the need to further support our great industry.”



All beef producers in Illinois are entitled to one vote in the referendum. A producer is any person, regardless of age, who has owned or sold cattle in the previous year or presently owns cattle.

The referendum will be held during a 12-day window in February 2015 offering three ways a producer can cast a vote. Illinois producers are strongly encouraged to vote in-person at any Illinois FSA county office from Feb. 16-20 or at the Illinois Beef Expo in Springfield Feb. 19-22. If a producer is unable to access in-person voting locations, a mail-in ballot may be downloaded from the IBA website, www.illinoisbeef.com, between Feb. 16-27 and postmarked no later than close of business Friday, Feb. 27, 2015.

Producers with questions about the procedures and eligibility for voting in this referendum or for more information on how funds generated by the assessment can be used, can contact the Illinois Beef Association at 217-787-4280 or visit www.illinoisbeef.com.


Illinois beef producers are being asked to consider a state checkoff in an effort to increase promotion and education efforts for beef.

Monday, December 1, 2014

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

Last week, live cattle were mixed, feeder cattle were lower as the grains were higher. Live cattle rebounded from being down early, finishing mixed, $0.65 lower to $1.00 higher. The gains occurred mostly in the upfront contracts. Feeder cattle were lower as deferred live cattle futures were lower. Feeder cattle closed $0.80 to $1.98 lower. The CME feeder cattle index was $240.69, $0.54 lower last Tuesday. Boxed beef values were stronger Tuesday as Choice was $1.17 stronger and Selects were $1.42 firmer. The grains had a positive day as soybeans led the way. Soybeans gained 14 to 17 ¼ cents. Wheat was close behind gaining 9 ¾ to 13 ¼ cents Tuesday. Corn was also strong adding 6 to 7 cents.

Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Monday, November 17, 2014

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

The fed cattle market in the North and South was not established at press time but the market tone was steady to stronger compared to the previous week. Boxed beef prices were higher for the week and are expected to strengthen over the next few weeks as supplies will remain tight and holiday buying will increase.

Feeder cattle were steady to $4 higher last week. Calves were steady up to $10 higher for calves that qualify for winter grazing programs. Slaughter cows were steady for the week.

Corn trended higher last week as harvest was only 4% behind the long-term average of 84% complete. The USDA's November grain production report came out last week, the USDA's November corn yield estimate was 173.4 bu/ac, .08 bu/ac below the October report.

Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Monday, November 10, 2014

BQA: Capturing value through quality beef


Cattlemen have a long-standing commitment to quality beef. Now, they can step up that commitment by participating in the checkoff-funded Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program and participate in Illinois Beef Association (IBA) sponsored training and certification sessions.

Delivering a quality beef product to the consumer requires more than just superior genetics – trustworthy handling practices are the link that assures consumer satisfaction.

BQA is important to the cattle industry as it gives producers a set of best practices for producing a safe and high-quality beef product. It also gives consumers the assurance that the beef they eat is both healthy and wholesome.

The program covers best management practices such as proper handling and administration of vaccinations and other products, better cattle handling principles, profit tips, and insight to consumer preferences.

“Many producers leave with a sense of validation of the bulk of their practices, but an exited feeling that they have picked up on a few tips that can give them a competitive advantage in the beef market,” said Travis Meteer, state BQA coordinator. “BQA certification serves as hard evidence to the effort and level of care animals receive day in and day out. BQA approved practices lead to a safe, wholesome product that consumers demand. We have all made the comment – what is best for the animal is best for our bottom line. If you are talking the talk then BQA is walking the walk.”



Curt Rincker, a Simmental breeder from Shelbyville, places a lot of value on the BQA program because it was designed by cattlemen for cattlemen and has the research and results to back it up.

“When I realized the improvements made in recent beef audits due to injection sites, I felt it was equally important for the cow-calf sector to also apply the same beef safety practices,” Rincker said.

Rincker’s education through the BQA program has enhanced his day-to-day management practices and enhanced animal well-being on his farm.

“I’ve made a real effort to follow proper injection site guidelines along with more frequent needle and syringe changes during routine vaccinations,” he said. “Practicing more patience in cattle handling procedures and an improved understanding of cattle movement through the BQA program, not only takes stress off of my cows, but takes some stress off of me to. It’s a win-win for all on my farm.”

According to Buzz Iliff, Wyoming Vet Clinic veterinarian, the industry has seen good evidence that a calmer animal stays healthier and provides a much better product in the tenderness of the meat.

“From personal experience, it is gratifying to see producers adopt and follow BQA guidelines and improve their operations,” Iliff said. “More importantly, keeping good treatment records and strictly following withdrawl times on any antibiotics and medications will insure a safer product.”

At the end of the day, the consumer is the industry’s demand driver. If that consumer is willing to open up their wallet, as an industry, we need to produce a consistent product that gives the beef buyer a great eating experience time and time again.

Even at beef’s current high retail prices, John Lundeen, NCBA senior executive director of market research, said consumers are willing to pay the price, but expectations for quality have also risen.

“The checkoff-funded Consumer Beef Index study measures demand drivers and we see taste topping the charts with safety and value following close behind,” Lundeen said. “Those characteristics along with confidence in the beef industry’s production practices are often how consumers describe quality.”

He added that consumers are stepping up to the case and purchasing the product because cattlemen have done a great job to continuously improve their production practices. But, it can’t stop here – the industry is in a strong point now, but producers need to continue to invest in education and keep the momentum going.

“Without a doubt the end-result of all of the BQA guidelines and practices that we as BQA certified producers use, is a safer end-product for our beef consumer. Being BQA certified is the right thing to do and has continued to improve the perception of beef from gate to plate,” Rincker said.

Cattlemen are invited to attend BQA training sessions this winter sponsored by the IBA to learn about the latest best management practices and become BQA certified. There is a $25 registration fee payable at the door to cover the cost of meals and training materials and reservations are encouraged by contacting the IBA at 217-787-4280.

The meetings will begin at 6 p.m. with a meal followed by the training session.

Dates and locations are:
  •          Dec. 2, Litchfield, Lincoln Land Community College Arts & Technology Building –               Multipurpose Room
  •          Dec. 4, Quincy, Adams County Farm Bureau Building
  •          Dec. 9, Paris, Edgar County Fairgrounds – Multipurpose 4-H Building


Beef Producers Promote Positive Image of Agriculture

A Chicago-area mom gave beef producers Mike and Lynn Martz and the entire Larson family the ultimate endorsement after touring their Maple Park farm Oct. 18. She expressed concerns about hormones in beef, but after a discussion about hormones in food from Mike she said she feels confident about choosing beef for dinner.

“I started this journey wondering many things: one of them was ‘Should I pay more for naturally raised, free range, non-hormone added beef? Is it worth the extra money per pound? Am I being an irresponsible parent to NOT want to pay the extra money in feeding my kids?’ Last week, at Larson Farms I got my answer – NO, there is no way I am paying extra. For me, it will be about the cut – not the hormones. In the end, when it comes to added hormones in my beef, ‘Frankly my dear I don’t give a beef.’,” said Lynn Prehm of Naperville.



Welcome to the third year of Illinois Farm Families (IFF) Field Moms – a program for Chicago-area mothers who have questions about farming and how their food is raised. IFF is a coalition of commodity groups for beef, pork, dairy, corn, soy and the Illinois Farm Bureau.

The Field Moms were able to tour the Larson Farms cattle handling facility and learned about the process of ultrasounding cattle. They also viewed the cattle in barns while Mike explained the benefits of confinement feeding from an animal welfare standpoint. He also showed the Field Moms a variety of cattle feeds and discussed nutrition.

 

Before a tapas-style lunch featuring a variety of hearty ground beef meals prepared by Larson Farms family member, Barb, the tour hosts presented a cooking demonstration, and explained marbling, steak selection, and the USDA beef grading system.

Mike pointed out the moms weren’t the only ones that learned from the experience.

“We get a better idea of our consumers and their thoughts,” he said. “The moms were very open-minded and had great questions. The Field Moms program is a great way to share our story about the beef industry.”



The tour was extended to 17 Field Moms and guests, a dietician and national blogger, and Rep. Robyn Gabel (R-Evanston) and constituents. After the tour, the Field Moms were asked to blog about their experience. Read their thoughts about the tour and beef at www.watchusgrow.com.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Illinois Cattlemen Tell USDA: Don't Hijack the Checkoff

The Illinois Beef Association (IBA) recently sent a letter to Agriculture Secretary Vilsack, urging him to cease any efforts to establish an additional beef checkoff under the 1996 General Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act. IBA President Alan Adams of Sandwich said beef producers in Illinois are highly concerned that this effort by the Secretary will harm the success of the current checkoff and erode producer support.

"Illinois cattlemen will not support any attempt to supplement or replace the Beef Checkoff with the 1996 Act. The 1996 Act is simply not a proper fit for the beef industry," Adams said. "The industry's Beef Checkoff program enjoys the support of a vast majority of beef producers, as it should. Recent research shows that it returns $11.20 for every dollar invested. To impose a new checkoff without a referendum and to lay the control of that program in the hands of the federal government will jeopardize our industry's research and promotion efforts for political gain."

Secretary Vilsack announced to representatives of various stakeholder groups on Sept. 30 that he intended the USDA's Agriculture Marketing Service to begin drafting a proposed rule to implement a supplemental checkoff under the 1996 Act.

"The foundation of the 1985 Beef Checkoff is the participation of state beef councils," Adams said. "Through the state beef councils, grassroots producers invest and direct programs that build demand for their product and help direct research and promotion dollars on the state and national level. By comparison, the 1996 Act is a top down, federally controlled program that not only fails to recognize the role of the states, but places the control and administration of promotion dollars in the hands of bureaucrats in Washington D.C. We oppose greater government control of our industry and heavy-handed, federally-mandated action by giving more power to the federal government."

More information can be found at www.beefUSA.org and producers can sign a petition directing the administration to abandon their efforts to take over the Checkoff here


Thursday, October 2, 2014

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

The fed cattle market was not established in the North or South as of press time, but the market tone was steady to weak compared to the previous week. Boxed beef prices were softer last week but strengthened towards the end of the week as lower prices attracted buyers.

Feeder cattle were steady to $4 higher amidst increased cash receipts. Calves were mostly steady to narrowly mixed. Slaughter cows were steady to $2 lower for the week as the 90's lean trim showed some weakness midweek.

Corn traded several cents lower again last week as warm fall weather across most of the country aided crop maturity.

Check out today's
 Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Illinois NRCS Announces EQIP Application Deadlines


Illinois State Conservationist for USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Ivan Dozier announced that November 21, 2014 and January 16, 2015 will be the two Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) application deadlines. “Producers can sign-up for EQIP at any time throughout the year, but to compete for the upcoming funding periods, I encourage producers with resource concerns to submit an application by one of the application deadlines.” Dozier explains.

Many applicants have shown interest in the funding pool to address soil erosion and water quality issues on cropland. “There are also funding pools for grazing land operations, confined livestock operations, organic producers, and wildlife habitat improvement, just to name a few,” Dozier said.

In addition to conservation practices, EQIP provides funding for the development of plans, such as Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans (CNMP), Grazing Plans, Drainage Water Management Plans, and others.

Producers interested in EQIP should submit a signed application (NRCS-CPA-1200 form) to the local NRCS field office. Applications that are submitted by November 21, 2014 and January 16, 2015 will be evaluated by NRCS staff. The staff will work with producers to complete worksheets and rankings in order to compete for funding.

For more information on EQIP, contact the local NRCS field office or visit www.il.nrcs.usda.gov.

Monday, September 15, 2014

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

The fed cattle market was not fully established in the North at press time, but the market tone was steady to softer last week. On trade that had occurred in the North it was in a range of $248 to $252, near steady with the previous week. In the South, live cattle traded at $161 to $162, $1 to $2 lower than the previous week.

Boxed beef prices were mixed for the week as Choice product closed steady and Selects closed lower, following the seasonal pattern as the spread widens into the fall.

Feeder cattle and calves were both steady to $5 higher for the week. Feeder cattle and calf receipts are increasing seasonally into the fall. Slaughter cows were steady for the week.

Corn trended lower again last week as the USDA's September Crop Production report showed an increase in yield of 4 bushels/acre over the August report, increasing the stocks to use ratio to 14.70 percent.

Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Monday, September 8, 2014

Finding More Grazing Days


by Travis Meteer, U of I Beef Extension Specialist

The current cattle market can be distracting. Record high prices, while certainly a good thing, can leave many cattlemen in a state of awe and amazement. Instead of getting caught watching high prices this fall, your time will be better spent monitoring the cost side of your cattle business.

Cow-calf producers can significantly reduce costs by extending the grazing season and delaying feeding of purchased feeds. Common sense and research both tell us cattle are most profitable when they are harvesting their own feed. Allowing cattle to graze into late fall and early winter is crucial to reducing costs. Even with lowering commodity prices, grazing is still the cheapest way to feed cows. Stockpiled forages, cover crop forages, and grazing crop residue are all options for extending the grazing season.



Cool season forages, especially fescue, are excellent candidates for stockpiling. While fescue may garner a bad reputation for endophyte issues and poor production in the summer months, fall is a time to shine for fescue. Cool temperatures in the fall negate complications with elevated body temperatures when cattle are consuming endophyte infected fescue. Re-growth in the fall is primarily green leaf tissue and the plant is not putting on seed heads which are a feared, concentrated source of the endophyte.

The stockpiling process starts with designating pastures that will be used for stockpiling. Cattle need to be removed from the selected pastures in early to mid-August. Applying supplemental nitrogen in August has proven beneficial to yields. When pastures were allowed to stockpile until Dec. 1, applying 50 pounds of actual N per acre in early to mid-August can add approximately 25 pounds of DM per pound of N added or 1,250 pounds of DM per acre.

Grazing management will greatly influence the ability to utilize stockpiled forages. Strip grazing is the common and most recommended practice. Strip grazing will allow close to a 70% utilization of the available forage, a 30% improvement over continuous grazing. Stockpiling fescue for 90-100 days will typically yield approximately 2000 lbs. DM per acre. Assuming a 1400 lb. cow eats 3% her body weight in DM, the cow would eat 42 lbs. DM per day. Using strip grazing, an acre of stockpiled fescue could support a cow for 33 days. Adding 50 lbs. of N can gain an extra 21 days of grazing under the same management and stocking rate.  





Illinois is blessed with very fertile farmland. Higher land prices, soil health benefits, and the ability to grow more feed are incentives to add cover crops to a diversified farming operation. Using cover crops following cash crop production for added forage is one of the best opportunities for Illinois cattlemen to lower production costs. There are numerous options for farmers depending on their crop rotation.

A popular choice after corn silage or in idle wheat ground is seeding a mixture of oats and turnips. Two bushel of oats and 4 pounds of turnips per acre will give a nice stand and offer around three to four tons of DM per acre. Annual Ryegrass is another cover crop that needs to be planted in late summer. Yields can be two to four DM tons per acre. Annual Ryegrass will overwinter and will require good management in the spring to achieve termination of the stand. Oats and turnips will winterkill.

Cereal rye, triticale, and mixes including them are good options for producers looking to provide forage possibilities in the early spring. Many will chop and bag these forages prior to planting beans in the spring. Weather can make this challenging; however yields of up to 4 dry tons per acre can be accomplished. As with any crop there will be variation in success depending on seed choice, weather, and management. Start a discussion with your seed dealer and investigate your options for cover crops.





The cost of grazing cornstalks is low; first because the cows graze and harvest their own feed and second, because all costs to produce the plant for grain production are attributed to the row-crop operation. Even with the cost of a temporary fence (which many farmers already have) and water, grazing cornstalks is more economical than feeding hay.
Cattle eat the more digestible and higher protein portions first. Therefore, a good mineral is probably the only supplementation needed for the first month unless the herd includes fall-calving cows or stocker calves.

Grazing stalks can also have benefits for subsequent crops. Cows grazing cornstalks for 60 days will remove approximately 30 to 40 percent of the residue. Residue buildup has been a well-documented problem in many corn-on-corn fields with new hybrids. Cows deposit nutrients in the form of manure back on the field. As they graze, they reduce volunteer corn, considered a weed and a yield-robber in soybean fields.

Using an equation developed at the University of Nebraska, a field that averages 170 bushels per acre yields 2,430 pounds of leaf and husk. Only 50 percent of the 2,430 pounds is available for the animal; the rest is trampled or lost in weathering. Thus, 1,215 pounds of DM husk and leaf per acre are available as feed.

A 1400-pound cow consumes 1,050 pounds of DM per month. At 170 bushels an acre, approximately 1 acre of cornstalks are needed to feed the cow for 30 days. To feed the same cow on cornstalks for 60 days, 1.5 to 2 acres would be needed.







Producers focused on keeping costs low will be the most profitable in 2014. Those profits could be substantial, allowing for updates and further investment into the cattle operation. Historically, the cow-calf business has been a break-even business. Thus, continuing to monitor the cost side will be important. Illinois cattlemen have the opportunity to use stockpiled forages, cover crops, and crop residues to keep cost low to allow large profits in 2014. 

*Previously printed in Illinois Beef magazine

Webinar - CattleFax TRENDS+ Cow-Calf Webinar

Webinar - CattleFax TRENDS+ Cow-Calf Webinar
DATE: Wednesday, September 17, 2014
TIME: 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. Mountain
The upcoming webinar will provide producers and industry leaders with a discussion on market factors affecting the cow-calf, stocker and backgrounding segments of the cattle industry this fall and winter. Elanco Animal Health is sponsoring the webinar - making it free for all cattle and beef producers to attend. To participate and access program details, producers and industry leaders simply need to register online.

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

The fed cattle market was not fully established in the North as of press time but the market tone was $8 to $10 higher for the week. On a dressed basis, cattle traded in a range of $248 to $252 and mostly $160 to $163 live. In the South, live cattle traded at $163, $8 higher than the previous week.

Boxed beef prices were modestly mixed for the week as Choice product closed higher and Selects closed lower, widening the spread. Feeder cattle were $2 to $10 higher for the week; calves were $4 to $10 higher against a limited number of receipts due to the extended holiday weekend. Slaughter cows were steady to $2 higher compared to last week.

Corn traded several cents lower last week as it broke out of its 6-week trading range to the downside, as record large crop expectations continue to apply downward pressure.

Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

FREE BQA Certifications from Sept. 1-Oct. 31

For the third time, Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. (BIVI) is supporting the checkoff-funded Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program by sponsoring all online certifications this fall for producers who enroll from Sept. 1-Oct. 31.

Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. BIVI will pick up the $25-$50 certification fee for beef or dairy producers who are interested in becoming certified or recertified during this period. Visit www.BQA.org/team to take advantage of the open certification period.
The BQA program is important to the cattle industry as it gives producers a set of best practices for producing a safe and high quality beef product. And for dairy producers, this offering is also beneficial as a large percentage of dairy calves and market cows make their way into the food chain.

The BQA certification modules are customized to fit the specific needs of each segment of the cattle industry – cow-calf, stocker, feedyard and dairy operations. The program covers best management practices such as proper handling and administration of vaccinations and other products, eliminating injection site blemishes, and better cattle-handling principles.

“One of the challenges that beef producers face is having all of their employees become BQA-certified,” says Dr. Jerry Woodruff, Professional Services Veterinarian with Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. “Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica’s partnership with BQA helps offset some of those expenses, and we encourage producers and their employees to use the web-based training programs.”

More than 11,000 producers have taken advantage of Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc.’s BQA certification partnership. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc.’s partnership also includes financial support of the Beef Cattle Institute at Kansas State University, which developed the certification module.

To become BQA certified, or learn more about the program, visit www.BQA.org/team.

Disaster Funding Still Available for Illinois Cattlemen


After a dispiriting stretch of months and declining pasture and feed resources, things are finally looking up for cattlemen grazing in Illinois. But, it’s not too late to take advantage of the Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP) from USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA). With an ongoing sign up, the program helps producers with livestock forage losses associated with drought conditions that were experienced beginning in 2012.

The 2014 Farm Bill makes the LFP a permanent program and provides retroactive authority to cover eligible losses back to Oct. 1, 2011. The LFP provides compensation to eligible livestock producers that have suffered grazing losses for covered livestock on land used specifically for grazing. The grazing losses must be due to a qualifying drought condition during the normal grazing period for the county.

An eligible livestock producer must own or lease pasture physically located in a county rated by the U.S. Drought Monitor as having a D2 (severe drought) or D3 (extreme drought) – almost all counties in Illinois fall under those categories expect for a few counties in the Chicagoland area. Livestock must have been grazed during a normal grazing period for the region and have been owned, purchased or entered into a contract to purchase during the 60 days prior to the beginning date of a qualifying drought.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is encouraging producers who have suffered eligible disaster-related losses to act to secure assistance by Sept. 30, 2014, as congressionally mandated payment reductions will take place for producers who have not acted before that date. Livestock producers that have experienced grazing losses since October 2011 and may be eligible for benefits, but have not yet contacted their local FSA office should do so as soon as possible.

The Budget Control Act passed by Congress in 2011 requires USDA to implement reductions of 7.3 percent to the LFP in the new fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1, 2014. However, producers seeking LFP support who have scheduled appointments with their local FSA office before Oct. 1, even if the appointment occurs after Oct.1, will not see reductions in the amount of disaster relief they receive.

USDA is encouraging producers to register, request an appointment or begin a Livestock Forage Disaster Program application with their county FSA office before Oct. 1, 2014, to lock in the current zero percent sequestration rate. As an additional aid to qualified producers applying for LFP, the FSA has developed an online registration that enables farmers and ranchers to put their names on an electronic list before the deadline to avoid reductions in their disaster assistance. This is an alternative to visiting or contacting the county office. To place a name on the Livestock Forage Disaster Program list online, visit http://www.fsa.usda.gov/disaster-register.

Producers who already contacted the county office and have an appointment scheduled need do nothing more.

“Almost every beef producer in Illinois that was grazing cattle weighing more than 500 pounds during the drought should be eligible for the LFP,” said Rick Graden, Illinois FSA Executive Officer. “Thus far, more than $2 billion has been paid to U.S. cattlemen through the LFP and, as a permanent program, there is still a chance for producers to receive assistance by the Jan. 30, 2015, application deadline.”

However, with the USDA's most recent announcement, producers need to act fast to reap the program's full benefits.

Bill Graff of Middletown manages owned and rented pasture ground across two counties and utilizes a mob grazing management system for his cow-calf operation. He started the application process for the LFP earlier this summer and was recently approved for payment. He was initially disappointed with the total amount of payment he received due to the carrying capacity numbers set in his region. However, he estimates that with the few hours he spent reviewing his records to collect the necessary application data and the one or two trips made to his county FSA office, the process to receive payment was virtually “pain free” and did not take a lot of time.

“I encourage any beef producer that thinks he might quality for the LFP to visit his county office and go through the process. The people at FSA are good people and want to make sure things get done right so they can get you the assistance you need,” Graff said.



A visit to your county FSA office with your herd inventory numbers and pasture acreage certified will allow staff to fill out and submit an application for assistance. If pasture has not been certified it’s not a problem – a Late Filed Crop Acreage Certification can be filed free of charge. Pasture certification is crucial in the program to determine an operation’s stocking rate. The grazing carrying capacity for a county is established by the Illinois State FSA Committee with assistance from Natural Resources Conservation Service and U of I Extension grazing information.

“I know there are acres out there that producers’ graze that are not considered part of crop land, but can be used to determine the amount of acreage being grazed. For example, if a producer has 100 head of cows on 40 acres of pasture the LFP payment will most likely be reduced for overgrazing. But, there are probably other areas being grazed like timber edges and creek banks that can add acreage for a higher payment,” Graden said.



Once the application is completed, an FSA county committee reviews the paperwork to verify that acreage and animal units correspond.

Joni Bucher of Marietta manages a cow-calf operation with a rotational grazing system under an EQIP contract and enrolled in LFP in May; shortly after the program was made available on Apr. 15. She was pleased with the results – especially thanks to the work she’s done with EQIP. With her pastures already certified through EQIP, Joni was able to prove that pasture conditions have improved since the drought and her operation’s carrying capacity was already outlined in her contract. Bucher went through calving and vaccination records to determine her herd inventory at the time drought status was declared in her county.

“Most beef producers are doing the right thing – taking care of their cattle and their land – and should take advantage of programs that offer assistance for the feed resources lost during the tough times of the drought. Be honest when filling out the application and the process should go smoothly,” Bucher said.



Graden said producers might have applied for assistance earlier this year and were denied due to baling hay on a pasture before grazing. FSA recognized the issue and eliminated that detail from the submission process, so producers should resubmit their application in this instance.

While the deadline isn’t until the end of January, Graden recommends visiting your county office before the end of September as the FSA work load will start increasing with the ARC PLC program.

“Scherrie Giamanco, Illinois FSA State Executive Director appreciates the patience of livestock producers in Illinois with the LFP and encourages cattlemen to take advantage of assistance,” Graden said.

With specific questions about the program, producers should contact their county FSA office.