Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Winter Manure Application: Best Practices and Rules


by Ted Funk, consulting engineer with the 
Illinois Beef Association and a retired agricultural engineer at the University of Illinois

It seems that every year around this time, full manure storages and Old Man Winter team up to force a difficult choice for some livestock farmers. Where, when, and how can we apply manure safely?

The risks of nitrogen loss and phosphorus runoff are related to the amount of time between nutrient application and the crops taking up those nutrients. But the major risk in winter is gross movement of manure to surface water causing offensive conditions. “Risk” is the key word here, and we must wisely balance three risks:
  • water quality impacts from field runoff, due to uncontrollable weather event(s) after manure application
  • manure storages having sufficient capacity vs. overflowing from normal and/or abnormal inputs
  • getting crops planted late vs. under the right conditions in springtime
Full manure storages, with no place to go, clearly put your farm in jeopardy. Even more important, earthen-embankment storages (lagoons or holding ponds) that overtop may experience catastrophic berm erosion failure, releasing large amounts of waste as a point source discharge. 

As of August 2014, there are some modifications to the Illinois EPA rules governing winter application of manure. Those rules affect classes of facilities in different ways, so let’s make sure you know in which class your facility falls. First, answer these questions that affect how you can approach winter spreading of liquid manure:

1. Are you operating under an NPDES permit or considering applying for coverage?

2. Are you working with Illinois NRCS under an EQIP contract that includes the 590 Nutrient Management standard?

3. Is your single facility considered “large” under the LMFA (based on more than 1,000 animal units capacity) or are you required under the LMFA, due to owning multiple facilities in Illinois that add up to more than 1,000 animal units capacity, to have the LMFA-style waste management plan?

4. Is your facility considered a “large CAFO” under the new IEPA CAFO regulation and you want the protection of the Ag Stormwater Exemption lined out in the new rule?


Answering these questions can be difficult for some facilities, but there are fine points about winter manure spreading regulations that may change your mind about where and when to spread.

Let’s be clear about timing. The really big and nasty manure runoff events occur in late winter, because that’s when the precipitation events are typically heavier. So, if you know you will be spreading in winter, get it over with early, and do not wait until late February or early March. 

If you answered “yes” to question (1), you have restrictions on winter spreading already spelled out in your permit. The new Illinois EPA rules affect new permits; existing NPDES permits operate under the older rules.

If you answered “yes” to question (2), my best advice is to confer with your local NRCS office about how to meet and maintain your obligations in the land treatment section of your Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan as it affects your EQIP contract.
A “yes” answer to question (3) puts your facility under the set of waste management plan rules in the LMFA (900.801 et seq). Consult the LMFA rule on facility size (900.802) to determine whether that set of rules applies to you.  Any size facility has to abide by the old Illinois EPA rule, Section 560 Design Criteria for Land Application of Livestock Waste, 560.206 Frozen or Snow-Covered Ground:  “Waste application on frozen or snow-covered land should be avoided. If wastes are spread on frozen or snow-covered land, such application should be limited to land areas on which:

a) Land slopes are 5 percent or less, or
b) Adequate erosion control practices exist.”

That’s it. Slope of the field, erosion control practices in place. 

However, if you are required by the LMFA by virtue of your facility size to have a waste management plan, the LMFA also requires that you keep records of the dates of application, the fields, and the amounts of manure applied to each field.

But here’s the caveat printed elsewhere in the regulation: even though the rules give vague restrictions about slope limits and “adequate erosion control practices,” you may still be subject to a complaint, investigation, and water quality violation notice if runoff to surface water occurs. Use common sense about where to apply, limit the rates and stay away from surface water. Prioritize fields for winter application, to reduce risk. Spread on the low-risk fields last in the season, if you need the room, and reserve some very low risk “bail-out” fields if possible.

Finally, if you answered question (4) with “yes” you now have a more extensive list of winter spreading restrictions than you did prior to the new set of rules. These restrictions don’t apply if soil conditions allow you to inject or incorporate the manure, but even then you are obliged to observe good practices according to your normal nutrient management plan. To claim the Ag Stormwater Exemption in the event of a discharge off your fields, you have to be able to show that you have taken appropriate and reasonable steps to get through the winter months without spreading manure—and that those steps just weren’t enough this year. Here are the winter restrictions (with my abbreviations) listed in Section 502.630 “Protocols to Land Apply Livestock Waste During Winter”:
  • No surface application is allowed on frozen, snow- or ice-covered land unless there is no practical alternative and your storage is going to overflow otherwise.
  • You must have a winter application plan in place; that plan includes your selection of available fields that meet the criteria in 502.630 c). Your list of available fields may change from year to year, depending on several factors including crop rotation.
  • You have notified IEPA in writing by Dec. 1 that your storages are insufficient to carry you through 120 days.
  • Surface spreading must be worked around the weather forecast. The rules are more stringent for snow or ice-covered fields than for just frozen ground. 
  • Setbacks are increased a lot for winter conditions. 
  • Monitoring fields for manure-laden discharges during melting and runoff is required, as is reporting such discharges to the Agency. See 502.630 for more details.
Calendar date 
Dec. 1 is the implied date, after which you need special dispensation to surface apply on frozen, ice or snow-covered fields, if you operate under an NPDES permit or want the Ag Stormwater Exemption for a Large CAFO.

Field characteristics
Anything that reduces soil erosion is usually a plus for selecting a manure application field. Extremes: surface-applied and unincorporated manure, normal rates, on a frozen HEL field that’s had corn silage removed—a formula for trouble. Injected liquid manure on a non-tile-drained, NHEL field that has lots of corn crop residue—you’re looking good. Which brings up all the discussion about vegetative buffers, vegetative fence rows, cover crops, pasture and hay field options, etc.—keep your options open when the spreading window starts to close. Tile drains could be trouble: monitor the outlets if you spread manure over tile drains. Some fields with shallow soils over bedrock, gravel, or sand should be avoided as well, and for operations with a permit, must be carefully selected.

Soil surface—snow or ice cover
If you surface apply on snow or ice, it’s reasonable to assume there won’t be any infiltration until the cover thaws—then snow or ice melt will take manure with it. The only protection you have is more distance to surface water, less slope, and more residue or crop cover. But if you can inject liquid manure into non-frozen soil beneath the surface, there is no specific prohibition against it—just the slope limit and vague erosion control guidelines. I’d suggest you carefully monitor runoff during a melt and do damage control if you find manure coming off the field.

Caveats
By the way, one of the more sure ways to force your operation into the NPDES permit program is to be slipshod about spreading manure in winter. No dumping! Manure should be applied at a maximum of the “agronomic” rate of nitrogen or phosphorus, depending on the specific situation. There is no provision in the rules for “emergency over-application” of manure! If you aren’t sure of the rate you should use, don’t guess; make a phone call. And there is no excuse for operating a spreader that has not been calibrated. 

Don’t spread close to, or onto, waterways. Observe common sense practices. Especially with drag hose applications doing surface application (since you don’t turn off the flow during turns), lay out the hose so that you stay well away from waterways or other conduits to surface water. Plan on leaving extra-wide setbacks if you are applying on frozen ground, especially if it is ice- or snow-covered. Be prepared to clean up releases caused during disconnecting and cleaning hoses.

Those facilities that are required by virtue of size (over 1,000 Animal Units) to have a manure management plan under the LMFA are already bound to respect the manure spreading setbacks from surface water and well heads. But those setbacks should be honored by smaller operations as well; fall and winter spreading are, if anything, more sensitive times for manure runoff, and setbacks help. Keep written records of manure storage levels as we head into winter. 


IBA has retained the services of Ted Funk, a licensed professional engineer and former University of Illinois agricultural engineering professor, to visit individual farms by request of producer members. IBA will share in the cost of this confidential professional service as a membership benefit. If you are interested in learning more about Dr. Funk’s services contact that IBA at 217-787-4280.

Friday, March 13, 2015

Statewide Beef Checkoff Referendum Passes by Wide Margin


The Illinois Beef Association (IBA) announced today that the recently held statewide referendum to restart the Illinois Beef Checkoff passed with an 88 percent majority vote. 1,057 ballots were cast with 934 for and 123 against. The vote totals were certified this week by the Illinois Department of Agriculture.

“We’re proud to participate in this process whereby cattle producers in Illinois are taking progressive steps to promote the beef industry in Illinois,” said Philip Nelson, acting director of the Illinois Department of Agriculture.


“We are very pleased with the results of the referendum. Restarting our voluntary state checkoff has been a priority mission for the beef association over the last year and we’ve been encouraged at each step in the process by the support of cattle owners around the state and our VOTE YES coalition,” said IBA Executive Vice President Reid Blossom.


The referendum spanned 12 days from Feb. 16-27 with cattle owners across the state casting ballots by mail, in person at local FSA offices, and in person at the 2015 Illinois Beef Expo. Clear majorities for support were evident in each venue with mail in ballots showing a 68 percent yes vote, FSA office polling showing 73 percent in favor, and Illinois Beef Expo polling returning a 97 percent supportive vote.

“This is tremendous news for cattlemen in Illinois. We are very grateful for all the support this effort saw from cattlemen statewide. Now, the real work begins and that’s putting into effect programs that will benefit all beef producers in Illinois by promoting our product and our industry,” said Alan Adams, a cow-calf producer and cattle feeder from Sandwich, who serves as IBA president.


The Illinois Beef Checkoff was originally created by state statute in 1983, three years before the start of the national $1 beef checkoff. When the national program started, Illinois’ state checkoff was shelved and required a full petition and referendum process to be reinstated. The favorable results from February’s referendum are not unique for beef checkoff votes in Illinois; in 1988 cattlemen in the state voted 83 percent in favor to support the national beef checkoff program in a referendum that made that program permanent.

The Illinois Beef Checkoff is different from the national checkoff in three distinct ways: the state checkoff is voluntary, all money collected stays in Illinois, and the state checkoff has more flexibility; meaning money can be spent additionally on youth and producer profitability or specifically promoting Illinois-raised beef. The program will be administered by the 14 cattle producers serving on the IBA Board of Governors’ Checkoff Division. The assessment of 50 cents per head is collected each time an animal is sold in addition to the national checkoff and any producer can receive a refund of their state checkoff. Collections of the Illinois Beef Checkoff are set to begin July 1, 2015. For more information, contact the IBA at 217-787-4280.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

IBA Announces Environmental Consulting Service



New member benefit provides assistance on various farm specific issues.

Members of Illinois Beef Association (IBA) now have a new membership benefit available  - a consulting service, which will assist with various issues that confront their farms.

IBA has retained the services of Ted Funk, a licensed professional engineer and former University of Illinois (U of I) agricultural engineering professor, to visit individual farms by request of producer members. IBA will share in the cost of this confidential professional service. Examples of assistance include:

  • Identifying areas of the farm facility or manure handling system that might be out of compliance with environmental regulations or could potentially cause problems with water quality or odor concerns

  • Basic review of the farm’s manure nutrient management plan to help identify parts that need to be updated or improved

  • Assist producers in providing a response to a regulatory agency’s visit or written notice or help in preparation of an upcoming visit

  • Suggest areas where the farm might begin or expand work with a Technical Service Provider or other consultant
“Beef producers are committed to environmental responsibility in every aspect on our farms,” said Alan Adams, a LaSalle County cattleman and current IBA president. “We take a number of steps each day to ensure we are caring for our land, air and water. This new membership benefit is providing cattlemen with risk aversion and management options from an industry expert in a low-pressure atmosphere that will help producers continue to further enhance the beef industry’s commitment to the environment.”



According to Funk, there are a number of reasons why a producer might be contact due to environmental risk factors, including: manure management, facility construction, and livestock mortality. The biggest blind spot for beef producers is open, outdoor lots with the need to control run-off.

“An outdoor lot as a facility opens beef producers to regulatory risk,” Funk said. “Beef producers don’t really go into the business to manage manure and as a facility morphs over time it’s not uncommon to have the potential for run-off into a ditch or stream. It can be a tough situation to handle, but with some forward planning we can anticipate how to comply with regulations.”


Funk also encourages producers get past the mindset that regulators are out to get them. It’s important to look at one’s system objectively and plan to make changes and if these changes are going to require extensive capital then there are cost-share programs available to lessen the burden. And, oftentimes, when a cattleman enters into an EQIP contract with the NRCS it will build credibility with the EPA.

“I thoroughly enjoy working with livestock producers,” Funk said. “I’ve been doing farm visits all over the state as an Extension agricultural engineer for more than thirty years; now that I’ve retired from the University of Illinois and have more time to focus on this type of service, I am sure I can help our Illinois beef producers gain confidence that they are doing the best possible job of environmental stewardship.”


Interested producers should contact the IBA directly to sign up for and schedule the service. For more information, contact Reid Blossom at reid@illinoisbeef.com or 217-787-4280.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Beef Producers to Vote on Illinois Beef Checkoff


Illinois beef producers have the opportunity to invest in the future of their industry by voting for the Illinois Beef Checkoff as ballot boxes open Monday.



With anticipated robust beef demand and continued high retail beef prices on the horizon, the need for strong promotion and marketing strategies will become increasingly important to make certain demand for beef products remains strong among consumers. A state-level beef checkoff program in Illinois can address this dynamic trend. All money collected in Illinois through the voluntary Illinois Beef Checkoff will stay in Illinois. This means state checkoff will not go to any national organization. The state checkoff is different from the national program in that it does not have the constraints placed on the national $1 checkoff. Namely, our state checkoff could be used to promote beef raised specifically in Illinois, which is not allowed under the federal program.


All beef producers in Illinois are entitled to one vote in the referendum. A producer is any person, regardless of age, who has owned or sold cattle in the previous year or presently owns cattle.

The referendum will be held during a 12-day window in February 2015 offering three ways a producer can cast a vote. Illinois producers are strongly encouraged to vote in-person at any Illinois FSA county office from Feb. 16-20 or at the Illinois Beef Expo in Springfield Feb. 19-22. If a producer is unable to access in-person voting locations, a mail-in ballot may be requested from the IBA office by contacting 217-787-4280 and postmarked between Feb. 16-27.

Producers with questions about the procedures and eligibility for voting in this referendum or for more information on how funds generated by the assessment can be used, can contact the Illinois Beef Association at 217-787-4280 or visit www.illinoisbeef.com.

American Heart Association® Certifies Extra Lean Ground Beef as Part of a Heart-Healthy Diet

The Beef Checkoff Program announced today that Extra Lean Ground Beef (Ground Beef that is at least 96% lean, 4% fat) is now certified by the American Heart Association® to display its recognized and respected Heart-Check mark. Retailers now have the opportunity to help identify eight different extra lean beef items as options for part of an overall healthy diet to their shoppers using one of the most trusted nutrition icons on food packaging today.
The extra lean beef cuts that meet the American Heart Association’s® requirements for heart-healthy foods as part of an overall healthy dietary pattern, and are certified to display the Heart-Check mark, include:

“Beef has many nutritional benefits and having the American Heart Association certify yet another beef cut empowers consumers to feel good about including beef in their diet, not only for its great taste but for its nutritional value,” said Jo Stanko, a cow-calf operator from Steamboat Springs, Colo., and vice chair of the Checkoff’s nutrition and health subcommittee. “Beef farmers and ranchers like myself share a common goal; to help consumers make shopping decisions to fit their needs and lifestyles by educating them about the health benefits of their food. To this end we will continue to support valid science to show consumers how extra lean beef is part of a healthy diet.”

Before putting its Heart-Check mark on any food, the American Heart Association® evaluates it against nutrition requirements based on sound science regarding healthy dietary recommendations, food categories, specific product ingredients and nutrient values.
Multiple retailers with hundreds of stores across the U.S. currently display the Heart-Check mark on certified beef items in the meat case. Retailers and processors can work with the Beef Checkoff Program to receive a discount on the certification fee for the American Heart Association® Food Certification Program.

Resources such as on-pack labels, posters and recipes are available for retailers to use in store and in shopper communications to promote the certified beef cuts.

To learn more about participating in the American Heart Association® Food Certification Program, please visit www.BeefRetail.org.

For more information about your beef checkoff investment, visit MyBeefCheckoff.com.

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

Fed cattle trade in the South was at $160 to $162 last week, steady to $3 higher compared to the previous week. Live cattle trade in the North was not established as of press time but the market tone was steady to firm compared to the previous week. The beef complex was lower last week but firmed at the end of the week as buyers stepped back into the market.

Feeder cattle were $3 to $5 higher last week. Calves also found support last week as they were steady to $6 higher. Cull cow prices were steady last week.

Corn was stronger last week as an early week rally provided strength to the corn market.

Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Economics of Bull Buying


How much can I afford to pay for a bull?

Submitted by Travis Meteer, U of I Beef Extension Specialist for Illinois Beef magazine

A popular question this time of year is “How much can I afford to pay for a bull.” My go-to answer is usually – “How much revenue loss would you have from a pasture full of open cows?” After all, we often de-value the role of the bull. We forget that he is a crucial part of the equation to making our product.

Now, the question is a good one to ask. Especially after watching calf prices climb seemingly all of 2014 and the prices paid for bred heifers at year-end, it is only logical to wonder what a good bull will cost this spring.

Old rules of thumb are good to reflect on. For instance, “two times the value of a fat steer” or “four to five times the value of a feeder calf”, are both common measures used by old-timers to determine the value of a bull. So, I tested these figures with historical prices from the Illinois Performance Tested Bull Sale and prices paid for feeders and fats from National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). As it turns out, using values from 1996 to 2014 (the last 19 years) the average bull price was four times the value of a feeder calf and 2.1 times the value of a fat steer. Looks like those old rules of thumb work pretty well.

Using these multipliers, we can speculate to the average price of bulls this coming sale season. Looking at recent market reports, 500-pound feeder calves are bringing $2.40 or more. Thus, value of a 5-weight feeder calf is conservatively $1,200. History tells us four times that value will get us close to the average. Thus 4 x $1,200 = $4,800 for an average bull price.

A conservative price for fat steers weighing 1,300 pounds is $1.60. Therefore the math tells us a fat steer values out at nearly $2,100. The previously stated multiplier of 2.1 times the value of a fat steer would yield an average bull price of just over $4,400. Thus, we have a conservative range of $4,400 to $4,800 for the average bull price.

That said, there will be many bulls that bring in excess of those figures. So, what factors contribute to bulls bringing more than the average? Are they worth the extra money?
For simplicity, let’s say a bull breeds 25 cows per year for four years resulting in 100 calves over his lifespan. With these conservative assumptions, even a small improvement in a valuable trait can greatly increase a bull’s value.

For instance, Calving Ease (CE) EPD is defined as the difference in percentage of unassisted births. So, let’s say you purchase a bull that is five points better in his CE than the breed average for current sires. For both Angus and Simmental, that would mean purchasing a bull in the top 10 percent of the breed for that trait – not an unrealistic buy. The 5-point improvement should translate to five percent more unassisted births. In the real world, it’s fair to say half of assisted births don’t make it. Thus, a five percent improvement in CED could easily translate to 2.5 percent more calves. Out of 100 calves sired over a lifetime, that’s 2.5 more calves. The added value from improved CE would be $3,000 (2.5 more calves x 500 lbs x $2.40/lb.).

The most common example for added value of a bull is improved EPDs for weaning weight (WW). Let’s say you purchase a bull with a WW EPD of 60 (breed average for Angus is 50). That’s 10 additional pounds at weaning per calf. If the bull sires 100 calves in a lifetime and a pound is worth $2.40, then the result is $2,400 more income over his lifetime when compared to the average of current sires.

Another figure bull buyers can look at are $ values (Weaned Calf Value ($W), Beef Value ($B), All-Purpose Index (API), Terminal Index (TI)). These values are expressed in dollars and if you match your herd needs with the correct index, they can help you be more profitable. In the January/February 2014 issue of Illinois Beef magazine, I discussed these indexes in a column titled “Understanding and UtilizingEconomic Indexes in Sire Selection”. You can find this piece archived on my blog.

When selecting your next herd sire, identify the traits that can add dollars to your operation. Don’t sacrifice functionality, structural soundness, docility, and other traits that can affect longevity. View purchasing a bull as an investment and treat it as such. Investing in a good bull that can improve profitable traits in your herd can allow your farm to be more competitive no matter the market dynamic.


Bottom line, bulls are a significant contributor to profit or loss in your cattle herd. The have an impact now and for years to come if you are retaining replacement females. Look for traits that hold value in your market. Find a bull that can inject those traits. The “expense” of a bull can be a great investment in the future of your cattle herd.

Monday, December 8, 2014

Cattlemens Webinar Series: End of Year Tax Strategies for Cattlemen

Register Now for the free webinar on Dec. 9, 2014!
6:00 p.m. Mountain (MST)


When the clock strikes midnight on December 31st, there are very few options that taxpayers have to reduce their tax bill. With higher revenue this year and many unknown tax changes that may or may not be passed by Congress, it is important to understand the strategies that producers in agriculture have to keep Uncle Sam out of their pocket.

Presentation Descriptions:


Larry Kopsa, CPA

Larry Kopsa, CPA is a member of the firm Kopsa Otte located in York, Nebraska. As a principal in the 28 person firm, he is involved in all aspects of the practice with an emphasis on tax planning, succession planning and business consultation, along with firm management. Besides serving on the board of directors of the Nebraska State Chamber of Commerce, Larry is active on numerous local, state and national organizations. He is a frequent speaker, has authored numerous articles for various magazines, and also serves as an adjunct professor at York College teaching Income Tax courses.


Colin Woodall, NCBA Senior Vice President, Government Affairs
and Kent Bacus, NCBA Associate Director, Legislative Affairs


NCBA is focused on addressing tax extenders during the lame duck session of Congress and will focus on tax reform in 2015. Priorities for the lame duck include reinstating Section 179 expensing and 50 percent Bonus Depreciation to 2013 levels, as well as extension of the Conservation Easement Tax Credit and key Charitable Deductions. During the webinar we will also discuss upcoming tax reform efforts for 2015 and key provisions NCBA supports like estate tax (Sec 2032A), cash accounting, depreciation schedules, 1031 Like-Kind Exchange. Tune in and learn about these important tax provisions and how they may impact your operation.


Attend American Forage and Grassland Council Annual Conference

The American Forage and Grassland Council (AFGC) Annual Conference is scheduled for Jan. 11-14 at the Hilton St. Louis Frontenac near St. Louis, Mo. The conference brings forage producers, researchers and industry representatives from across the country to share forage related research and information. 

Jan. 11 begins with the AFGC board of directors meeting. However, the main conference begins at 8 a.m., on Monday, Jan. 12 with the keynote speaker, Dr. Temple Grandin, a nationally known consultant to the livestock industry, presenting Tips for Low Stress Cattle Handling. Additional topics on Monday include: Hay Preservatives & Additives: Are they Economical?; Keys to Success When Making Baleage; Can I Afford to Spray for Weeds, and other topics. Tuesday, Jan. 13 the agenda includes several workshops on the following topics: Using Cover Crops to Expand Your Livestock Operation; Recent Improvements in Cool Season Grasses; Baleage Fundamentals and Using NIRS as a Tool for Better Forage Management. The conference concludes on Wednesday, Jan. 14 with several sessions focusing on Plant Breeding and NIRS and Forage Quality & Using NIRS Nutrition Results.

The Conference will also include a commercial exhibit area, poster presentations, Emerging Scientist Competition, numerous networking opportunities and other activities.

A complete program agenda and preregistration information is available at http://www.afgc.org/. Early registration is due by Dec. 31 and one-day registrations are available. The AFGC Conference is co-sponsored by the Missouri Forage and Grassland Council and the Illinois Forage and Grassland Council.

AFGC is an international organization comprised of twenty affiliate councils in the United States and Canada with a total individual membership of about 2,500. Their primary objective is to promote the profitable production and sustainable utilization of quality forage and grasslands. Members represent members the academic community, producers, and private industry. Together, they unite in a common cause to promote and develop the forage industry.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Illinois Beef Checkoff Referendum Scheduled


IBA encourages a "Yes" vote to keep dollars in the state for beef education and promotion.

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – Illinois beef producers will have the opportunity to approve a state beef checkoff program, controlled by Illinois cattlemen and women, that could generate additional funds to promote beef in Illinois.

Petitions signed by more than 700 producers were submitted to the Illinois Department of Agriculture requesting a referendum on the Illinois Beef Market Development Act. If approved, the 50-cent per-head that producers would pay into a state checkoff program would supplement the national checkoff program. The program will complement and extend current research, promotion of Illinois-raised beef, and efforts to educate the youth of our industry while strengthening beef demand in the marketplace. The Illinois Department of Agriculture will oversee the referendum process.

“Our current national checkoff started in 1986 and its buying power has been eroded by 56 percent due to inflation over the years,” said Reid Blossom, IBA executive vice president. “Just like input costs on the farm, the cost of promotion and education has risen. The industry must invest in order to reach Illinois consumers and ensure a viable beef business for years to come, and the proposed Illinois Beef Checkoff would help in a number of areas.”



The Illinois Beef Checkoff is a voluntary 50-cent assessment on all beef cattle in Illinois collected at the time of sale. The funds from this collection will be controlled by farmers serving on IBA’s Checkoff Division of the Board of Governors and any cattleman not wishing to participate can have their full assessment refunded.

Alan Adams, a beef producer from Sandwich, said for him, reinstating the Illinois Beef Checkoff makes sense.

“Our industry is up against tremendous adversity,” Adams said. “The national checkoff has been successful in combatting those challenges, but more resources are needed to more aggressively confront beef industry issues that are critical to our way of life. The fast completion of the petition process and early backing from the Vote Yes coalition shows that Illinois beef producers recognize the need to further support our great industry.”



All beef producers in Illinois are entitled to one vote in the referendum. A producer is any person, regardless of age, who has owned or sold cattle in the previous year or presently owns cattle.

The referendum will be held during a 12-day window in February 2015 offering three ways a producer can cast a vote. Illinois producers are strongly encouraged to vote in-person at any Illinois FSA county office from Feb. 16-20 or at the Illinois Beef Expo in Springfield Feb. 19-22. If a producer is unable to access in-person voting locations, a mail-in ballot may be downloaded from the IBA website, www.illinoisbeef.com, between Feb. 16-27 and postmarked no later than close of business Friday, Feb. 27, 2015.

Producers with questions about the procedures and eligibility for voting in this referendum or for more information on how funds generated by the assessment can be used, can contact the Illinois Beef Association at 217-787-4280 or visit www.illinoisbeef.com.


Illinois beef producers are being asked to consider a state checkoff in an effort to increase promotion and education efforts for beef.

Monday, December 1, 2014

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

Last week, live cattle were mixed, feeder cattle were lower as the grains were higher. Live cattle rebounded from being down early, finishing mixed, $0.65 lower to $1.00 higher. The gains occurred mostly in the upfront contracts. Feeder cattle were lower as deferred live cattle futures were lower. Feeder cattle closed $0.80 to $1.98 lower. The CME feeder cattle index was $240.69, $0.54 lower last Tuesday. Boxed beef values were stronger Tuesday as Choice was $1.17 stronger and Selects were $1.42 firmer. The grains had a positive day as soybeans led the way. Soybeans gained 14 to 17 ¼ cents. Wheat was close behind gaining 9 ¾ to 13 ¼ cents Tuesday. Corn was also strong adding 6 to 7 cents.

Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Monday, November 17, 2014

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

The fed cattle market in the North and South was not established at press time but the market tone was steady to stronger compared to the previous week. Boxed beef prices were higher for the week and are expected to strengthen over the next few weeks as supplies will remain tight and holiday buying will increase.

Feeder cattle were steady to $4 higher last week. Calves were steady up to $10 higher for calves that qualify for winter grazing programs. Slaughter cows were steady for the week.

Corn trended higher last week as harvest was only 4% behind the long-term average of 84% complete. The USDA's November grain production report came out last week, the USDA's November corn yield estimate was 173.4 bu/ac, .08 bu/ac below the October report.

Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Monday, November 10, 2014

BQA: Capturing value through quality beef


Cattlemen have a long-standing commitment to quality beef. Now, they can step up that commitment by participating in the checkoff-funded Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program and participate in Illinois Beef Association (IBA) sponsored training and certification sessions.

Delivering a quality beef product to the consumer requires more than just superior genetics – trustworthy handling practices are the link that assures consumer satisfaction.

BQA is important to the cattle industry as it gives producers a set of best practices for producing a safe and high-quality beef product. It also gives consumers the assurance that the beef they eat is both healthy and wholesome.

The program covers best management practices such as proper handling and administration of vaccinations and other products, better cattle handling principles, profit tips, and insight to consumer preferences.

“Many producers leave with a sense of validation of the bulk of their practices, but an exited feeling that they have picked up on a few tips that can give them a competitive advantage in the beef market,” said Travis Meteer, state BQA coordinator. “BQA certification serves as hard evidence to the effort and level of care animals receive day in and day out. BQA approved practices lead to a safe, wholesome product that consumers demand. We have all made the comment – what is best for the animal is best for our bottom line. If you are talking the talk then BQA is walking the walk.”



Curt Rincker, a Simmental breeder from Shelbyville, places a lot of value on the BQA program because it was designed by cattlemen for cattlemen and has the research and results to back it up.

“When I realized the improvements made in recent beef audits due to injection sites, I felt it was equally important for the cow-calf sector to also apply the same beef safety practices,” Rincker said.

Rincker’s education through the BQA program has enhanced his day-to-day management practices and enhanced animal well-being on his farm.

“I’ve made a real effort to follow proper injection site guidelines along with more frequent needle and syringe changes during routine vaccinations,” he said. “Practicing more patience in cattle handling procedures and an improved understanding of cattle movement through the BQA program, not only takes stress off of my cows, but takes some stress off of me to. It’s a win-win for all on my farm.”

According to Buzz Iliff, Wyoming Vet Clinic veterinarian, the industry has seen good evidence that a calmer animal stays healthier and provides a much better product in the tenderness of the meat.

“From personal experience, it is gratifying to see producers adopt and follow BQA guidelines and improve their operations,” Iliff said. “More importantly, keeping good treatment records and strictly following withdrawl times on any antibiotics and medications will insure a safer product.”

At the end of the day, the consumer is the industry’s demand driver. If that consumer is willing to open up their wallet, as an industry, we need to produce a consistent product that gives the beef buyer a great eating experience time and time again.

Even at beef’s current high retail prices, John Lundeen, NCBA senior executive director of market research, said consumers are willing to pay the price, but expectations for quality have also risen.

“The checkoff-funded Consumer Beef Index study measures demand drivers and we see taste topping the charts with safety and value following close behind,” Lundeen said. “Those characteristics along with confidence in the beef industry’s production practices are often how consumers describe quality.”

He added that consumers are stepping up to the case and purchasing the product because cattlemen have done a great job to continuously improve their production practices. But, it can’t stop here – the industry is in a strong point now, but producers need to continue to invest in education and keep the momentum going.

“Without a doubt the end-result of all of the BQA guidelines and practices that we as BQA certified producers use, is a safer end-product for our beef consumer. Being BQA certified is the right thing to do and has continued to improve the perception of beef from gate to plate,” Rincker said.

Cattlemen are invited to attend BQA training sessions this winter sponsored by the IBA to learn about the latest best management practices and become BQA certified. There is a $25 registration fee payable at the door to cover the cost of meals and training materials and reservations are encouraged by contacting the IBA at 217-787-4280.

The meetings will begin at 6 p.m. with a meal followed by the training session.

Dates and locations are:
  •          Dec. 2, Litchfield, Lincoln Land Community College Arts & Technology Building –               Multipurpose Room
  •          Dec. 4, Quincy, Adams County Farm Bureau Building
  •          Dec. 9, Paris, Edgar County Fairgrounds – Multipurpose 4-H Building


Striving to Sustainably Feed the World: 2014 Illinois Commodity Conference

The 2014 Illinois Commodity Conference is set for Nov. 25 at the Marriott Hotel & Conference Center in Normal. The conference represents a great opportunity for farmers in Illinois to see coalition-building and how the state agricultural commodity organizations are working together to improve agriculture as a whole. 

Striving to sustainably feed the world is the main focus of the conference with breakout sessions geared toward the environment and regulations, markets, and other hot-button issues. Following lunch and an annual awards ceremony, the conference keynote speaker, Rob Meyers with PepsiCo, will discuss his company’s push toward sustainability - what their customers want, how they define sustainability and their marketing initiatives, and how farmers will be involved and impacted.  

Agenda:

7:30 a.m. – Registration Opens
8-10 a.m. – ICGA Annual Meeting
10:00 – 11:00 a.m. – A Spoonful of Sugar Helps the GMOs 
Go Down, Richard Levick
11:15 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. – Breakout sessions
          Farmers Needed: Field to Market – Rod Synder
          Water Quality Control – Caroline Wade, Mike Plumer
          The Intersection of CAFO and WOTUS – Lauren
Lurkins, Ted Funk
12:15 p.m. – Lunch
12:45 p.m. – Awards Ceremony 
         John Sullivan honored with Friend of Ag Award
1:15 – 2:15 p.m. – Rob Meyers, PepsiCo
2:15 – 2:30 p.m. – Wrap up with Association Leadership
2:30 p.m. – Ice Cream Social

Registration and a fee is required. Register prior to Nov. 15 - $65 and after Nov. 15 - $90. Contact the Illinois Beef Association for help with registration at 217-787-4280.

Beef Producers Promote Positive Image of Agriculture

A Chicago-area mom gave beef producers Mike and Lynn Martz and the entire Larson family the ultimate endorsement after touring their Maple Park farm Oct. 18. She expressed concerns about hormones in beef, but after a discussion about hormones in food from Mike she said she feels confident about choosing beef for dinner.

“I started this journey wondering many things: one of them was ‘Should I pay more for naturally raised, free range, non-hormone added beef? Is it worth the extra money per pound? Am I being an irresponsible parent to NOT want to pay the extra money in feeding my kids?’ Last week, at Larson Farms I got my answer – NO, there is no way I am paying extra. For me, it will be about the cut – not the hormones. In the end, when it comes to added hormones in my beef, ‘Frankly my dear I don’t give a beef.’,” said Lynn Prehm of Naperville.



Welcome to the third year of Illinois Farm Families (IFF) Field Moms – a program for Chicago-area mothers who have questions about farming and how their food is raised. IFF is a coalition of commodity groups for beef, pork, dairy, corn, soy and the Illinois Farm Bureau.

The Field Moms were able to tour the Larson Farms cattle handling facility and learned about the process of ultrasounding cattle. They also viewed the cattle in barns while Mike explained the benefits of confinement feeding from an animal welfare standpoint. He also showed the Field Moms a variety of cattle feeds and discussed nutrition.

 

Before a tapas-style lunch featuring a variety of hearty ground beef meals prepared by Larson Farms family member, Barb, the tour hosts presented a cooking demonstration, and explained marbling, steak selection, and the USDA beef grading system.

Mike pointed out the moms weren’t the only ones that learned from the experience.

“We get a better idea of our consumers and their thoughts,” he said. “The moms were very open-minded and had great questions. The Field Moms program is a great way to share our story about the beef industry.”



The tour was extended to 17 Field Moms and guests, a dietician and national blogger, and Rep. Robyn Gabel (R-Evanston) and constituents. After the tour, the Field Moms were asked to blog about their experience. Read their thoughts about the tour and beef at www.watchusgrow.com.

CattleFax - Weekly Recap

The fed cattle market in the South was $167 last week, $1 lower compared to the previous week. The fed cattle market in the North was also $167, $1 lower than the previous week. There was a stronger tone for the remainder of the showlist in the North. Boxed beef prices were softer last week as demand is still waiting for holiday buying to start.


Feeder cattle were mostly steady with instances of $2 higher. Calves were also steady with instances of $4 higher. Slaughter cows were mixed, from $2 higher to $2 lower. Corn maintained a sideways trading range and closed several cents lower for the week.

Corn harvest is at 65% last week compared to the long-term average of 77% over the same time period.
Check out today's Chart of the Day. For recent market news and analysis, visit CattleFax.com.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Illinois Cattlemen Tell USDA: Don't Hijack the Checkoff

The Illinois Beef Association (IBA) recently sent a letter to Agriculture Secretary Vilsack, urging him to cease any efforts to establish an additional beef checkoff under the 1996 General Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act. IBA President Alan Adams of Sandwich said beef producers in Illinois are highly concerned that this effort by the Secretary will harm the success of the current checkoff and erode producer support.

"Illinois cattlemen will not support any attempt to supplement or replace the Beef Checkoff with the 1996 Act. The 1996 Act is simply not a proper fit for the beef industry," Adams said. "The industry's Beef Checkoff program enjoys the support of a vast majority of beef producers, as it should. Recent research shows that it returns $11.20 for every dollar invested. To impose a new checkoff without a referendum and to lay the control of that program in the hands of the federal government will jeopardize our industry's research and promotion efforts for political gain."

Secretary Vilsack announced to representatives of various stakeholder groups on Sept. 30 that he intended the USDA's Agriculture Marketing Service to begin drafting a proposed rule to implement a supplemental checkoff under the 1996 Act.

"The foundation of the 1985 Beef Checkoff is the participation of state beef councils," Adams said. "Through the state beef councils, grassroots producers invest and direct programs that build demand for their product and help direct research and promotion dollars on the state and national level. By comparison, the 1996 Act is a top down, federally controlled program that not only fails to recognize the role of the states, but places the control and administration of promotion dollars in the hands of bureaucrats in Washington D.C. We oppose greater government control of our industry and heavy-handed, federally-mandated action by giving more power to the federal government."

More information can be found at www.beefUSA.org and producers can sign a petition directing the administration to abandon their efforts to take over the Checkoff here